Abstract Title
Evaluation of flipped classroom methodology in teaching third year medical students

Authors

Stephan L. Haas
Mary Hyll
Jonas Hedlund
Robert Schvarcz

Theme

3BB The lecture and the flipped classroom

INSTITUTION

Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine - Stockholm, Sweden

Background
  • E-learning enables asynchronous learning which can take place when and where it best suits the individual student.
     
  • According to the flipped classroom model students are engaged in collaborative learning after prior completion of an e-learning module.
     
  • In a recent pilot study where the topic taught was viral hepatitis (n=32), 79% of students considered this new form of teaching better than the traditional1.

 

STUDY DESIGN

  • In a prospective monocenter study, participants consisted of 80 third-year medical students who were enrolled in a course on infectious diseases (module viral hepatitis).
     
  • Group A (n=40) underwent a “classic” 90 minutes-long lecture about viral hepatitis without the option for e-learning. Group B (n=40) had access to a video lecture (20 min.) combined with additional text content and a subsequent multiple-choice test with 30 items.
     
  • As a Learning Management System (LMS) for e-learning, PingPong (www.pingpong.se) was used. In a short seminar (45 minutes) Group B students discussed cases of hepatitis.
     
  • A student survey with paraphrased comments regarding students’ opinions of the flipped model was applied besides a questionnaire scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Finally, students were assessed in a written exam covering key topics of hepatitis.
References

M. Hyll & R. Schvarcz, ePOSTER 19068, AMEE 2014

Summary of Results

 

Final examination: Results:

Flipped class: 18\25 correct answers, Control group: 18\25 correct answers (p= 0.92)

 

 

Questinnaire / 1-5 (very bad - outstanding) Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied.

 Question Flipped group controlls p value

    Overall evaluation of the course 

4.1 3.5 0.01

    How comprehensive was the course

3.8 3.8 0.49

   How relevant was the course

4.6 4.0 0.001

   Course participation made me confident to take care of         pts with viral hepatitis

3.5 3.9 0.25

The course stimulated me to be an active student

4.1 3.9 0.16

The course improved my problem-solving skills

3.7 3.1 0.01

The course improved my active learning skills

4.2 3.8 0.08

 

  1. How accessible was the video? 4.3 (1-5)
  2. How was the quality of the video? 4.4 (1-5)
  3. How do you value an internet-based teaching module prior class teaching: 4.0
    (comments:  “flipped classroom: boom!” –“Bad”)


  4.  

Conclusion
  • Replacement of a 90 minutes standard lecture by a 45 minutes long case seminar in conjunction with a prior e-learning module will lead to equivalent student results in a written examination.
  • Blended teaching based on the flipped classroom model has the potential to increase motivation, satisfaction and problem solving skills of medical students. Further studies with a larger number of students are warranted.
Background
References
Summary of Results
Conclusion
Send ePoster Link