ePoster
Abstract Title | The effect of high fidelity simulation experience as undergraduates on confidence levels in O&G

Authors

  1. Ms. Catriona Reid
  2. Ms. Naomi Fenton
  3. Ms. Bina Vekaria
  4. Mr. Callum Ettles
  5. Mr. Edward Poynton
  6. Dr. Naila Siddiqui

Theme

Simulation and Simulated Patients

Category

Simulation

INSTITUTION

Imperial College London

Background

High fidelity simulation (HFS) training has been used for a number of years in medical schools to help teach medical students how to deal with situations occurring in acute and emergency medicine. Undergraduate students who have had training using HFS in the acutely ill patient have found the experience a `valuable addition’1 to their learning. 

Obstetrics and Gynaecology foundation doctors are trained, in part, using simulated patients. Medical students are not, however, yet given this opportunity.

Conclusion

 

The confidence of students significantly improved in decision making and recognising patients in immediate danger. These areas may have improved most with HFS because students have less exposure to them during their rotation. This is supported by the raw data that shows students are less confident in these two areas before HFS than in the other domains that confidence was assessed in. A larger study is required to explore this further.

Take-home Messages

We propose embedding HFS into the undergraduate O&G curriculum to improve confidence in decision making and ability to recognise patients in immediate danger since these are necessary skills required by junior doctors.

Summary of Work

The aim was to assess whether teaching with a simulated patient improved confidence in situation awareness, history taking, decision making and knowing when senior help is required. The confidence levels of eleven students were measured using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire before and after a HFS training session comprising an acute ectopic pregnancy. 

 

Summary of Results

T-tests were carried out on the mean scores of the Likert-scale before and after HFS to determine any significant change in confidence. Click 'more detail' to see enlarged graph. 

Acknowledgement

Dr. Roger Sharpe, Director of Medical Education, Northwick Park Hospital

Dr. Colin Mason, Research Fellow, Northwick Park Hospital

Dr. James Budge, Foundation Year 1, Ealing Hospital

References

1. Macdowell, J. (2006) The assessment and treatment of the acutely ill patient—the role of the patient simulator as a teaching tool in the undergraduate programme, Medical Teacher, 28(4): 326-9

2. Paskins, Z; Peile, E. (2010) Final year medical students' views on simulated-based teaching: a comparison with the Best Evidence Medical Education Systematic Review, Medical Teacher, 32(7): 569-77

3. Hansen, M. (2008) Versatile, Immersive, Creative and Dynamic Virtual 3-D Healthcare Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10 (3):e26

Background
Conclusion
Take-home Messages
Summary of Work
Summary of Results

Table 1; mean scores of the 5-point Likert scale before and after the simulation. n=11

Confidence in:

Before (mean)

After (mean)

p-value

1. recognising a medical emergency

3.727

3.909

0.29

2. history taking

3.545

3.909

0.18

3. recognising patients in immediate danger

3.273

4.091

0.0011

4. management

2.636

3.545

0.002

5. knowing when senior help is required

3.909

4.182

0.28

Acknowledgement
References
Send ePoster Link