ePOSTER  
Theme: Curriculum Planning / Community Oriented Medical Education
  • Currently 5.00/5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 5
  • 5

Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)

Abstract Title Logo
Student clinical learning in under-served, GP community areas
Authors: Paul Crampton*
John McLachlan
Jan Illing
Institutions: Centre for Medical Education Research, Durham University, UK www.dur.ac.uk/school.health/cmer/
Background

1) The current model of undergraduate clinical placements is predominantly hospital based, however students are increasingly placed in community environments where populations are under-served.

The primary driver for this change is concerns about insufficient future general practitioner (GP) numbers.

The prominent issues: lack of student interest, lack of student exposure, and difficulty in access to healthcare, persist for areas including rural and urban, and with higher levels of deprivation.

Community placements aim to give students enhanced exposure to the local patient demographic hence they are often generalist in nature, in primary care settings over long periods.  

 

 

Summary of Results

3) Fifty-four articles were included in the final review. Four main categories were identified:

  • Student performance:  Student exam scores did not significantly differ by taking a non-traditional under-served area placement2,3
  • Student perceptions: Included a deeper understanding of primary care, breadth of opportunity, developing responsibility over time, and integrating with the community4,5
  •   CCcCareer Pathways:  CaThe studies found that all students (regardless of background) were more likely to undertake a rural post after a community placement6,7
  • Supervisor experiences: Included giving something back to medical education, professional development, and refining practice8,9

Internationally, under-served area placements have produced beneficial implications for students, supervisors, and the community.

Acknowledgement

I would like to than the John Simpson Memorial fund (Hild Bede College, Durham University) for providing funding for me to attend the AMEE conference.

References

   See details

 

Summary of Work

2) A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the strengths and weaknesses for medical students and supervisors of community placements in under-served areas.

 

 Search terms  used were combinations and variations of four concepts exploring:

  • GP primary care
  • Medical students
  • Placements
  • Location characteristics

 Search techniques: Database searching, reference list checking, pearl (article) growing, use of own sources .

Articles were analysed using a textual narrative synthesis1; this approach allows an encompassing appreciation of studies whilst describing gaps in the literature.

 

Conclusion

4) The placements identified benefits for students developing their clinical knowledge, confidence, interpersonal skills and increasing the likelihood of them returning to work in the area.

To provide a holistic appreciation of medicine and develop professional capabilities are principles that may benefit all medical students, regardless of their future roles.

There is a growing amount of evidence for rural, under-served areas but there is little in relation to inner-city, deprived areas, and none in the UK.

Take-home Messages

5) A Durham University pilot programme will allow students to experience the complex issues of primary healthcare in under-served, inner-city, deprived areas.

Designed & Managed by Innovative Technology®
Background
Summary of Results

Study characteristics

The majority of the studies reported data from Australia (n= 26) and USA (n=15). Other countries included Canada (n=7), UK (n=4), New Zealand (n=1), South Africa (n=1), and Japan (n=1).

The majority of the studies had been published after 2000 (n=51), 25 of which were published during or after 2008.

Acknowledgement
References

 1Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, Law C, Roberts HM. Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7: 4.

 2Wilson M, Cleland J. Evidence for the acceptability and academic success of an innovative remote and rural extended placement. Rural Remote Health 2008;8:960.

3Lacy NL, Geske JA, Goodman BJ, Hartman TL, Paulman PM. Preceptorship rurality does not affect medical students' shelf exam scores. Fam Med 2007;39 (2):112-115.

4Nyangairi B, Couper ID, Sondzaba NO. Exposure to primary healthcare for medical students: Experiences of final-year medical students. SA Fam Pract 2010;52 (5):467-470.

5Couper I, Worley P, Strasser R. Rural longitudinal integrated clerkships: lessons from two programs on different continents. Rural Remote Health 2011;11:1665.

6Williamson M, Gormley A, Bills J, Farry P. The new rural health curriculum at Dunedin School of Medicine: How has it influenced the attitudes of medical students to a career in rural general practice? N Z Med J 2003;116:1179.

7Eley D, Baker P, Chater B. The Rural Clinical School Tracking Project: more IS better--confirming factors that influence early career entry into the rural medical workforce. Med Teach 2009;31 (10):454-459.

8Hudson JN, Weston KM, Farmer EA. Engaging rural preceptors in new longitudinal community clerkships during workforce shortage: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12: 103.

9Barritt A, Silagy C, Worley P, Watts R, Marley J, Gill D. Attitudes of rural general practitioners towards undergraduate medical student attachments. Aust Fam Physician 1997;26 (Suppl 2):S87-90.

 

Summary of Work
Conclusion
Take-home Messages

Please visit: https://www.dur.ac.uk/school.health/cmer/

Send ePoster Link