Theme: Simulation |
Human Patient Simulation Training in End of Life Care | ||||||
|
||||||
Most health professionals are involved in the care of dying patients at some stage in their careers. Unfortunately, not all receive training in this field (Sullivan 2003). Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the UK, end of life care has received a lot of negative media attention recently with concerns that current practice is "flawed'. A large government initiated review has since highlighted a number of problems, most specifically relating to communications skills and the quality of care delivered (Neuberger 2013).
In view of this we feel there is a need for more focused and effective training for health professionals who have contact with terminally ill patients and their carers.
End of life care is challenging due to the complex interplay of emotional, ethical and clinical considerations presenting in each case. Optimal care requires a health care professional to utilise a diversity of skill mix in an integrated manner. We believe human patient simulation (HPS) may address this educational challenge by using interactive clinical scenarios, run in real time to recreate 'real life' situations.
The use of HPS for palliative care is a new concept (Pease 2007). The aim of our pilot training session is to show the effectiveness of this teaching modality in this field of training.
At our purpose built simulation centre, we prepared four palliative care scenarios which were delivered to doctors and nurses in the fields of palliative care and geriatric medicine. These were mapped to curriculum based learning objectives.
The clinical scenarios were:
- Opioid toxicity in palliative care (Hospice setting)
-
Time pressured decisions at end of life (A & E Resus setting)
- Family communication regarding the terminal care pathway (Ward setting)
- Artificial nutrition for patient with dementia (Nursing home setting)
Specific communication challenges within the scenarios included:
- Breaking bad news
- Dealing with anger/conflict
- Discussing resuscitation decisions
- Ethical dilemmas
Each role play consisted of:
- One trainee
- A patient relative (played by a professional actor)
- Other nursing / medical staff (played by simulation faculty)
All other trainees watched and critiqued the scenarios via a live video link. The observers were asked to offer peer feedback on both clinical and communications skills. A formal facilitated video debrief followed each scenario.
After the session, each participant wrote a series of reflective statements on their experience of the training, which underwent thematic analysis.
Emergent themes in feedback:
- Improved understanding and awareness of facilitative aids / barriers to communication by learning in a 'real life' context
- Helped demonstrate how human factors impact on communication and performance
- Advanced feedback on 'end of life' communications skills
- Allowed colleagues to learn from each other’s experience
The sensitive nature of end of life care and related discussions limits the extent of observational training feasible in clinical practice.
When compared to other clinical scenarios in the workplace, supervision and objective feedback are thus restricted, reducing educational opportunities and thus creating a training dilemma.
According to the recent government review the care that terminally ill patients and their relatives receive in the NHS has been sub optimal. Partly, this may be attributed to the training difficulties mentioned above.
The use of HPS in palliative care allows for structured, contextualised learning with feedback in a safe environment and thus provides an ideal training modality for the many challenging and emotive scenarios faced in this field of medicine.
Mr Duncan Taylor StR Plastic and Burns Reconstructive Surgery, North West Deanery, UK.
Mr Nicholas Roberts ST Chair Geriatric Medicine (2012) North West Deanery, UK.
Ms Gaynor Stonecliffe Simulated Patient Coordinator Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Dr Sash Noor FY2 Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Neuberger J More Care, less Pathway: A Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. Department of Health 2013 www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212450/Liverpool_Care_Pathway.pdf
Pease N, High-fidelity clinical simulation in cancer and palliative care education. In: Foyle L, Hostad J. Innovations in Cancer and Palliative Care Education. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. Ch.1 ed. 2007
Sullivan A, Lakoma M, Block S The Status of medical education in end of life care. Journal of General Internal Medicine Vol 18:9 p685-695 Sept 2003