• Currently nan/5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 5
  • 5

Rating: nan/5 (0 votes cast)

Authors Institution
Noriyuki Takahashi
Muneyoshi Aomatsu
Takuya Saiki
Takashi Otani
Nobutaro Ban
Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
Gifu University, Medical Education Development Center, Gifu, Japan
Department of Educational Sciences, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya Univ
Theme
8AA Communication skills
Exploring the effect of using real patients cases in peer role-play in undergraduate medical interview education: a qualitative study
Background

Although reality is important for communication skills training in undergraduate clinical education1), a peer role-play generally uses scenarios which have the limitation of reality2). The aim of this study is to explore how the real patients’ cases with whom medical students encountered in outpatient clinical clerkship affect a peer role-play to learn patients’ perspectives. 

Summary of Work

We conducted two half-days of medical interview skills trainings for the 5th year medical students during their clinical rotation at Nagoya university department of General Medicine. This program consisted of three stages: medical interview in outpatient practice, peer role-play and group discussion. We conducted twelve focus groups after the training session and 63 medical students participated in it from 2012-2013. The transcripts of the focus groups were analyzed qualitative analytical method named "Steps for Coding and Theorization" (see more detail). The Ethical Committee of Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine approved this study (2012-0027).

Table 1. Details of this program

Summary of Results

The process of understanding patients’ perspectives

Phase 1. Realization about patients' “unexpected narratives” 

Students realized patients' “unexpected narratives” through an interview with a particular patient and discussion with attending doctor in out patient practice. Because patients’ perspectives hid or explained or connected with unexpectedly from the viewpoints of students, they found patients’ perspectives as unexpectedness. The realization of “unexpected narratives” let them understand that patients’ perspectives gave meanings by patients’ contexts without relating to medical knowledge. These students’ understandings are considered from the grasp about patients’ individuality and variety, which real patients take a crucial part of learning3).

Phase 2. Reflection about patients’ “unexpected narratives”

Patient-role students had opportunities to reproduce patients’ “unexpected narratives” in peer role-play. This reproduction let them reflect on relations of patients’ perspectives to contexts. Role-play suggests promoting the refleciton4). Doctor-role students recognized patients’ “unexpected narratives” as a character of patients.

Phase 3. Share about patients’ “unexpected narratives”

Through a discussion, audience shared patients’ “unexpected narratives” by two factors. First, clinical reasoning of a particular patient caused the share of “unexpected narratives” as the authenticity in case based learning5). Second, voluntary disclosure by patient-role students about the reflection of “unexpected narratives” caused to share the narratives accompanied by a stimulation of students’ emotional empathy6)

Figure 2.  The process of understanding patients’ perspectives

Conclusion

Real cases with whom medical students encounter in outpatient clinical clerkship affect students in a peer role-play and discussion to reflect and share the individuality and variety of patients' perspectives, which real patients take a crucial part to learn.

Take-home Messages

Using real cases help students’ reflection and share the understanding about the individuality and variety of patients' perspectives. Similar teaching methods will also be applicable in postgraduate education.

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research awarded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant Number 24659239, 2012/4-2015/3

References

1) McGaghie, William C., et al. "A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009." Medical education 44.1 (2010): 50-63.

2) Kurtz, S. M., et al.  "Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine." Oxford: Radcliffe Pub. (2005).

3) Spencer, John, et al. "Patient-oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students." Medical education 34.10 (2000): 851-857.

4) Clapper, T. "Role play and simulation." Education Digest 75.8 (2010): 39-43.

5) Thistlethwaite, Jill Elizabeth, et al. "The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23." Medical teacher 34.6 (2012): e421-e444.

6) Aomatsu, Muneyoshi, et al. "Medical students' and residents' conceptual structure of empathy: a qualitative study." Education for Health 26.1 (2013): 4.

Designed & Managed by Innovative Technology®
Background
Summary of Work

About the qualtitavie analitical method, "Steps for Coding and Theorization; SCAT"

It is a sequential and thematic qualitative data analysis technique, consisting of a four-step cording process in which a researcher makes themes and constructs from transcripts, writing a story-line by weaving the themes and constructs, and offering theories from the story-lne. This approach has a nature in its explicit process of analysis, the characteristic that the process integrates the qualitative data analysis with the theoretical coding, and for its efficiency and validity of theorization from the enhancement of the reflective quality of critique and falsifiability.

http://www.educa.nagoya-u.ac.jp/%7Eotani/scat/index-e.html

Summary of Results
Conclusion
Take-home Messages
Acknowledgement
References
Send ePoster Link