ePoster
More distinguishable in MMI for student selection

Authors

  1. Dr.Kalyanee Asanasak

Theme

9JJ Admission to Medicine and Postgraduate Training Programmes

INSTITUTION

SONGKHLA HOSPITAL MEDDICAL EDUCATION CENTER

Background

Background:  Princess of Naradhiwas University and Songkhla Hospital Medical Center are responsible for medical education in the southern part of Thailand. Out of 24 students each year, we detect about 1-3 students who have a poor performance and social skill. So MMI (multiple mini interviews) was introduced for student selection. The correlation and accuracy of both type of interviews, MMI and conventional interview (CI) were performed.

 

Summary of Work

Summary of Work:  All the 42 candidate medical students who passed the MCQ knowledge exam had undergone 9 stations MMI and also CI exam. Scores of MMI and CI were grouped as excellent, favorable and unfavorable. Then the correlation and accuracy were compared.

    

References

Reference:

1. Kevin W.Eva, Harrold I.Reiter, Jack Rosenfeld and Geoferey R. Norman,  The Ability of the Multiple Mini-Interview to Predict Preclerkship Performance in Medical School. Academic medicine  2004; 79:40-42

2. Salvatori P. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2001;6:159–75.

3. Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Huggett KN, Farrell PM. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2003;78:313–21.

4. Basco WT, Gilbert GE, Chessman AW, Blue AV. The ability of a medical school admission process to predict clinical performance and patients’ satisfaction. Acad.Med. 2000;75:743–7

Summary of Results

Summary of Results:  The MMI detected 4 unfavorable students. The CI detected 3 unfavorable students. Among 4 MMI unfavorable group (4/24 : 9.5%) , 2 were also found unfavorable in CI (2/45:4.7%) , 1 was found favorable in CI ( 1/42 : 2.35) but 1 was found excellent in CI ( 1/42 : 2.35). None of the unfavorable MMI had the excellent score in CI. The excellent and favourable MMI scores have a good correlation with the CI score.

Conclusion

Discussion and Conclusions:  MMI and CI show a correlation in detecting good and poor performing students. MMI seems to be more effective in distinguishing among the poor performing students than CI.

Take-home Messages

Take-home messages:  The MMI is a better way to detect the proper future medical student than CI. Even though it is time-consuming, complex and needs more medical staff, it is worth performing.

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgement: Best regard to Dr.Preecha  Wongsilaruk director of Songkhla Hospital . Dr. Ouichai Pleangprasit  Dean of Medical department Princess of Naradhiwas University and all medical doctor in Medical education center Songkhla Hospital. 

Background

Background:  Princess of Naradhiwas University and Songkhla Hospital Medical Center are responsible for medical education in the southern part of Thailand. Out of 24 students each year, we detect about 1-3 students who have a poor performance and social skill. So MMI (multiple mini interviews) was introduced for student selection. The correlation and accuracy of both type of interviews, MMI and conventional interview (CI) were performed.

Summary of Work
References
Summary of Results
Conclusion
Take-home Messages
Acknowledgement
Send ePoster Link