ePoster
Are medical teachers who are European Resuscitation Council lnstructors or Providers more successful than other medical teachers in training medical students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation ?

Authors

  1. Hunyadi-Anticevic Silvija
  2. Gordana Pavlekovic
  3. Davor Milicic

Theme

7JJ The Teacher

INSTITUTION

Croatian Resuscitation Council
Croatian Association for Medical Education
University of Zagreb School of Medicine

Background

It is well known from the literature that newly qualified medical doctors have insufficient practical skills needed for the care of acute patients, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills. It is however unknown if medical teachers should be internationally recognised CPR instructors or just giving them CPR guidelines is enough to teach CPR skills to medical students. During the academic year 2011/12 a longitudinal course “Fundamentals of clinical skills”, including a session on CPR, has been introduced at the University of Zagreb, School of Medicine. Out of 32 teachers from different clinical background there were 5 ERC (European Resuscitation Council) CPR instructors and 5  ERC CPR Providers.

Summary of Results

Retention of CPR skills after two years tested by standardised ERC CPR Assessment sheet (pre-test) is better for students trained by teachers with ERC CPR background compared to second group of students trained by medical teachers without ERC background (p<0,01), in particular for skills: call for help (p<0,01), open airway (p<0,01), assess breathing (p<0,01), get help-EMS (p<0,01) and chest compressions  (p<0,01)

Summary of Work

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the background training of medical teachers in CPR influences  medical students’ learning outcome. During the academic year 2013/14 ERC CPR/AED Course was introduced as the part of the “Fundamentals”. At the beginning of each CPR/AED Course students were tested for retention of their CPR skills using standardised ERC CPR Assessment sheet (pre-test). There were total of 130 3rd year students followed from their 1st year, 67 students trained by ERC Instructors and Providers (35 and 32, respectively) and 63 students trained by 10 medical teachers without  ERC background

Conclusion

 

Retention of CPR skills after two years is better for students trained by teachers with ERC background compared to students trained by teachers without internationally recognised CPR training.

 

Take-home Messages

The practical relevance of this research is to introduce a standardised, internationally recognised training in CPR according to European Resuscitation Council for medical teachers at the University of Zagreb, School of Medicine.

Background
Summary of Results

Table 1. Total number of skills achieved/not achieved at pre-test according to teachers' CPR background

 

 

Skills achieved

   N                 %

Skills not achieved

     N              %

    TOTAL

     N               %

ERC Instructors

 

227

 

72,1

 

  88

 

27,9

 

315

 

100,0

ERC Providers

 

 

176

 

61,1

 

112

 

38,9

 

288

 

100,0

ERC Providers + Instructors

 

403

 

66,8

 

200

 

33,2

 

603

 

100,0

Without ERC education

 

333

 

58,7

 

234

 

41,3

 

567

 

100,0

 

TOTAL (all)

 

736

 

62,9

 

434

 

37,1

 

1170

 

100,0

Summary of Work
Conclusion
Take-home Messages
Send ePoster Link