Theme: 5JJ Interprofessional education 2
  • Currently nan/5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 5
  • 5

Rating: nan/5 (0 votes cast)

Logo
Constructing a Focused, One-Week Multidisciplinary Learning Experience for Medical Students
Authors: Bailey
Christopher. H.
Yoshimatsu
Kei
Newman
James S.
Institutions: Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
 
Background

Interdisciplinary teams are becoming increasingly crucial to improving patient care as the profession of medicine evolves. The relatively stable relationships and hierarchies of the past are more likely to evolve to meet the needs of patient care, especially in acute care environments.1 Several studies have shown that interdisciplinary training of medical students and allied-health students improves communication and collaboration. These improvements in teamwork have been shown to impact patient care in meaningful ways.2  Teamwork can be hindered by stereotypes of the health professions. Stereotypes of the health professions have been reported to be present in students at the beginning and the end of their training.3 Many of these stereotypes are developed due to ignorance of the role and responsibilities of the profession. “Working together as an effective team requires mutual respect and a knowledge of the skills and abilities of each team member.”3

To address these stereotypes and improve patient care, institutions accrediting medical schools have instituted guidelines for the incorporation of interdisciplinary education into the medical school curriculum. The Liaison Committee on Medical Education’s standard for accreditation includes the following:

ED-19-A. The core curriculum of a medical education program must prepare medical students to function collaboratively on health care teams that include health professionals from other disciplines as they provide coordinated services to patients. These curricular experiences include practitioners and/or students from other health professions. 4

 This emphasis is echoed in the Association of  American Medical Colleges’ Guidelines for Medical Schools

An understanding of, and respect for, the roles of other health care professionals,and of the need to collaborate with others in caring for individual patients and in promoting the health of defined populations5

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, which oversees U.S. residency training also recognizes the importance of collaboration and interdisciplinary professionalism.

Residents must demonstrate interpersonal and communication skills that result in the effective exchange of information and collaboration with patients, their families, and health professionals.6

Students participating in interprofessional education have been found to rate other health care professionals more positively after their experience than they did prior to the experience.3 What is not clear, is the best way to educate students about health care teams, team-based models of care and the day-to-day activities of their future colleagues.

We propose the integration of a coordinated, one-week, multidisciplinary experience with practicing non-physician professionals in the clinic and hospital settings into the medical school curriculum. The following discusses the development of a interdisciplinary education program based on current perceptions and issues relevant to interdisciplinary training and patient care, and potential barriers to implementation. We used this information, as well as the competencies set forth for medical education by the Liaison Committee on  Medical Education (LCME), the AAMC, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Education, and Mayo Medical School to define the program and its participants’ objectives, and a method by which to evaluate participant performance and the program.

Design

Mayo Medical School integrates interdisciplinary training in its curriculum in several areas. Mayo Graduate School’s Physical Therapy program overlaps its anatomy course with the first-year medical students’ gross anatomy block. Collaboration and peer-teaching between the different programs’ students is incorporated into the curriculum. Second-year medical students and pharmacy students staff the free community medical clinic. This team-based approach with fellow learners in varying areas of study, enables students to work together in a collaborative educational and professional environment.

Building upon this institutional embrace of teamwork, a one-week curriculum was developed within the existing Mayo Medical School “Selectives” program. The MMS selectives program enables first and second-year medical students to select/develop 1-2 week experiences in nearly any area or aspect of medicine. A proposal for the selective is submitted to the medical school’s Selectives Director with a summary of the planned activities, as well as a set of personal learning objectives, and envisaged outcomes. The authors organized a one-week selective in which students shadow non-physician staff members of the hospital health care team. This selective consists of 6 half-day slots of shadowing in fields such as nursing, pharmacy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, social work, respiratory therapy, and administration with several additional slots open for the student to customize the areas of practice and experience desired. Upon completion of the selective, a debriefing session is performed with their physician preceptor, and a reflective essay is written regarding the experience using the following prompts:

  • What preconceptions of non-physician patient care professions did you have prior to your selective?
  • What did you enjoy?
  • Did your perspective change?
  • What did you find exciting or frustrating?
  • What was your interaction with your preceptor(s) like?
  • What is the role of the physician?

Evaluation of each participating student is performed by the staff member being shadowed according to criteria given to them and the student prior to the experience. These evaluations are reviewed by the selective preceptor (a physician) and a passing or failing grade given for the Selective, with feedback included for the student’s review. The student is given the opportunity to participate in a pre- and post-selective survey on their experiences and perceptions.

Summary of Work

We surveyed a variety of key players including medical students, nurses, nurse practitioners/physician assistants, physical therapists/occupational therapists, and other allied health professionals regarding their perceptions of integrating interdisciplinary education into the medical school curriculum and changing professional roles in health care. A one-week curriculum was developed based on these responses.

 

Table 1.    Responses to Survey Questions

1. A multidisciplinary approach to healthcare is essential in providing quality patient care.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

9

0

3

37

240

4.73

289

0.946

2. I understand the different roles played by my colleagues on the multidisciplinary team.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

3

11

24

157

94

4.13

289

0.826

3. I have been in a conflicting situation with a colleague on my multidisciplinary team.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

24

70

62

111

21

3.12

288

0.624

4. The physician is the leader of the patient care team.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

8

16

72

143

49

3.73

288

0.746

5. I would feel comfortable if a physician was not the leader of the patient care team.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

17

48

57

135

30

3.39

287

0.678

6. A non-hierarchical, collaborative environment would improve patient care.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

4

26

50

119

90

3.92

289

0.784

7. Medical students should have early, dedicated exposures to the different allied health professions as part of their education.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

4

7

10

106

161

4.43

288

0.886

8. Allied health shadowing should be a required part of medical school education.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

8

18

40

115

107

4.02

288

0.804

9. The benefits of multidisciplinary education in the medical school curriculum do not justify the additional time, expense and effort of its implementation.

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

Rating Average

Response Count

Percentage

100

104

58

17

9

2.07

288

0.414


 

Summary of Results

A survey was created to evaluate the perceptions of this proposed interdisciplinary education program, interdisciplinary care, and responsibilities of members of the health care team. It prompted the responder to evaluate a total of nine statements by a Likert scale consisting of five answers (Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neurtral, Agree, Strongly Agree). The questions were focused on evaluating whether or not they feel the multidisciplinary team care approach to medicine is valuable and if educational activities directed to emphasize such an approach would be worthwhile. (Interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary are use intechangably in our communications.)

The surveys were sent to various distribution lists consisting of medical students, nurses, NP/PAs, PT/OTs, and others.  A total of 289 responses were collected.  Of note, the PT/OT group was the largest responder (51.5%), followed by medical students (27.5%).  Nurses (12.4%), Nurse Practitioners, (8.0%), and “Others” (6.2%) - composed of Billing and Coding, recreational therapists, therapy technicians, vocational case coordinators, financial representatives, and insurance verification staff - accounted for the remaining participants. The results of each question responses are detailed in Table 1. Responses were also broken down into medical student and non-medical student groups to evaluate differences in the opinions of the two groups.

Medical student (MS) and non-medical student (NMS) responders agreed (95% and 94%) with the statement, “A multidisciplinary approach to healthcare is essential in providing quality patient care.”  The following questions and their response by MS and NMS responders are below:

“I understand the different roles played by my colleagues on the multidisciplinary team.” (MS: 72.8%, NMS: 86.8%). “I have been in a conflicting situation with a colleague on my multidisciplinary team.” (MS: 54.8%, NMS: 65.8%). “The physician is the leader of the patient care team.”  (MS: 82.4%, 71.6%). “I would feel comfortable if a physician was not the leader of the patient care team.” (MS: 59%, NMS: 71.4%). “A non-hierarchical, collaborative environment would improve patient care.” MS: 75.6%, NMS: 79.4%). “Medical students should have early, dedicated exposures to the different allied health professions as part of their education.” (MS: 83.2%, NMS: 90.6).  “Allied health shadowing should be a required part of medical school education.” (MS: 65.8%, NMS: 85.8%).  “The benefits of a multidisciplinary education in the medical school curriculum do not justify the additional time, expense  and effort of its implementation.” (MS: 52%, NMS: 37.2%).

Overall, most responders agreed to the statement that multidisciplinary care is essential in providing quality patient care (94.6%).   Furthermore, most responders seemed to think that medical students should have early, dedicated exposures to different allied health professions during their education (88.6%).  Medical students and non-medical student responders differ in their belief that this exposure should be required (medical students, 65.8%; non-medical students, 85.6%). Overall, both groups disagree with the statement that these exposures do not justify the additional time, expense, and efforts of its implementation (41.4%).  However, the degree is variable between the two groups (medical students, 52%; non-medical students, 37.2).

Interestingly, medical students are less likely to understand the roles played by their colleagues on the multidisciplinary team (72.8%) when compared to non-medical students (86.8%).  Furthermore, medical students are less likely to have been in a conflicting situation with their colleagues (54.8%) when compared to non-medical student respondents (65.8%).  Medical students are also found to be more likely to believe that the physician is the leader of the multidisciplinary team (82.4%) when compared to the non-medical student group (71.6%).  Furthermore, medical students feel less comfortable if the physician was not the leader of the team (59%) compared to non-medical student respondents (71.4%). The two groups were similar in their responses that a non-hierarchical, collaborative environment would improve patient care (medical students, 75.6%, non-medical students, 79.4%)

Take-home Messages

Medical students and allied health professionals agree that interdisciplinary care is essential to quality patient care. However, they have differing views on the necessity of incorporating interdisciplinary education into the medical school curriculum, even as medical students are less likely to understand the roles played by non-physician colleagues.

Conclusion

Overall, these are encouraging results that should prompt medical schools to further incorporate interdisciplinary education into their curriculums.

 

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine for its assistance in this project.

References

1.         Lewin S, Reeves S. Enacting 'team' and 'teamwork': using Goffman's theory of impression management to illuminate interprofessional practice on hospital wards. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(10):1595-1602.

2.         Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(3):CD000072.

3.         Ateah CA, Snow W, Wener P, et al. Stereotyping as a barrier to collaboration: Does interprofessional education make a difference? Nurse Educ Today. Feb 2011;31(2):208-213.

4.         Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree. In: Education LCoM, ed2013.

5.         Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education: Guidelines for Medical Schools. In: Colleges AoAM, ed1998.

6.         ACGME Common Program Requirements. In: Education ACfGM, ed2013.

 

Background
Summary of Work
Summary of Results
Take-home Messages
Conclusion
Acknowledgement
References
Send ePoster Link