Theme: 3II International
  • Currently nan/5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 5
  • 5

Rating: nan/5 (0 votes cast)

Logo
Comparison of the achievement in the Medical National License Examination Step 1 between the Joint Medical Programme SWU-UoN and the Thai Programme
Authors: Chote Werawong
MD.
Anongnard Kasorn
PhD.
Amarin Narkwichean
MD.
and Watchareewan Thongsaard
PhD.
Institutions: Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
 
Background

The Thai medicine programme, Faculty of Medicine Srinakharinwirot University (SWU) has been established since 1985. In 2003, we have cooperated with the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, the University of Nottingham (UoN), UK, initiating a Joint Medical Programme. During the first three years of this special programme, the students attend basic biomedical science degree at the UoN. After that, they continue their clinical subjects at the Faculty of Medicine, SWU. This study was designed to compare the achievement of the 1st exposure to the national license examination (NLE) step 1 of medical students between both programmes.

Summary of Work

For three consecutive years (2011‑2013), we have followed the scores of the 1st exposure to the NLE step 1 of medical students of the two programmes.

All students in the Thai medicine programme attend extra-tutorial courses for two weeks prior to the NLE step 1.  A selected group of students who had scored low in the basic biomedical science courses was arranged for an intervention consisting of extra-lectures, small group discussions, and questions and answers (Q&A) periods daily for 8 hours. A tutor system is set in which advanced students gave tutorial to other students in groups for 1–2 hours, 3 days per week during the two months before the NLE. One advanced student is assigned as a peer to 1–2 weak students. In addition, during the last two years, we have assigned a student who has obtained a mean higher than the 80th percentile score in basic medical subjects as a buddy to one weak student for two months prior the NLE.

On the other hand, as there are differences in perspectives and curriculum between Thai and U.K. medical courses, the students of the Joint Medical Programme are subjected to an intervention by additional tutorial activities consisting of voluntary group self-tutorial sessions (students are self-tutors), and questions and answers (Q&A) periods during weekends for three months before the NLE. They also communicated with their peers in Thailand for group-tuition and self-tuition materials during their three years studying at the UoN.

Summary of Results

During 2011, 2012, and 2013, the students in the Thai medicine programme who passed the 1st exposure for NLE step 1 were 92.50% (N=120), 99.16% (N=119), and 99.16% (N=119), respectively. Whereas, for the Joint Medical Programme during the same period, the students who passed the 1st exposure for NLE step 1 were 40.0% (N = 10), 22.2% (N = 9), and 100.0% (N = 10), respectively.

Conclusion

There are two main outcomes of Thai medicine study: 1) the intervention is effective, and 2) The subset of scores in basic medical subjects can predict the success in NLE step 1 exam.

In 2013, the Joint Medical Programme students had more awareness and worked very hard during weekends for extra tutorial activities in order to be able to improve their scores in NLE step 1.

Take-home Messages

An important factor was to stimulate the students and make them aware of the importance in preparing for the NLE step 1. Also students are made aware of the importance of self preparation, helping each other in learning, and helping their classmates without waiting for the teacher to arrange activities for them.

Acknowledgement

Thanks Srinakharinwirot University for support.

Background
Summary of Work
Summary of Results
Conclusion
Take-home Messages
Acknowledgement
Send ePoster Link