Theme: 2II Evaluation of teaching/Educational research
  • Currently 2.67/5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 5
  • 5

Rating: 2.7/5 (3 votes cast)

Logo
SETQ-co-Smart: an instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers during clerkships
Authors: Ines Rupp
Tobias Boerboom
Tjitske van Engelen
Kiki Lombarts
Institutions: Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam
 
Background

Individual teaching qualities of those supervising and teaching during clerkships are generally not systematically evaluated, however this is essential for optimizing the quality of medical education. The past years the System for Evaluating of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) was developed and validated to provide individual faculty with teaching performance feedback from their residents. The SETQ was recently revised (SETQ-Smart) to better fit modern ideas about graduate medical education. In this study validity evidence is sought for using an adjusted SETQ-Smart in an undergraduate setting.

Summary of Work

The SETQ -co-Smart is the adapted version for medical students to evaluate their clinical teachers. The questionnaire consists of 30 items and 7 domains of teaching performance (i.e. learning climate, professional attitude and behavior towards student, learning focus, evaluation, feedback, professionalism and role modeling)  combined with narrative feedback. A validation study is planned during a 6 months period including the clerkships internal medicine, surgery and pediatrics at one university hospital and 2 non-university hospitals. In order to gain broad acceptance for this project we spoke to key clinical teachers and informed faculty and residents by presentations and written information.

Summary of Results

The face validity of the instrument was assessed by the project group including experts in the field of professional performance and medical education, a clinician and medical students.

We wonder whether the SETQ-co-Smart will be as reliable and valid as the SETQ for faculty and residents.

Unfortunately we had some delay with the data collection; it now will start soon.

Conclusion

When validated, the SETQ-co-Smart can be a useful instrument to provide feedback to clinical teachers in undergraduate medical education.

Take-home Messages

Broad acceptance is needed to make such a project successful. Take enough time for this step and make sure that you address all relevant actors.

Reliable information on individual teaching qualities is needed to stimulate and support further improvement of medical education. Once feedback is acquired faculty and residents can use this to achieve improvement by transforming feedback into action. Hereby coaching should be offered.

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to the project group for the valuable comments and the selected clerkships for their participation.

Background
Summary of Work
Summary of Results
Conclusion
Take-home Messages
References
Acknowledgement
Send ePoster Link